On 20 Oct 2001 22:21:07 -0700, Dr. Paloma <Dr._member@newsguy.com> wrote:

>In article <Xns9140C5AA732AFmirelesonicnet@205.232.34.12>,
>mirele@nospamsonic.net says...
>>
>>Dr. Paloma <Dr._member@newsguy.com> wrote in
>>news:9qt1s20pv9@drn.newsguy.com:
>>
>>> In article <Xns914096E0DB515mirelesonicnet@205.232.34.12>,
>>> mirele@nospamsonic.net says...

Wait theres MORE:

>>>>
>>>>Dr. Paloma <Dr._member@newsguy.com> wrote in
>>>>news:9qsj9002v2q@drn.newsguy.com:
>>>>

Paloma the osa dingbat - man Im gonna need a new category for OSA fools, we sure seemed to have smarter scientologists in scientology back when I was in.
Paoloma's performance embarrasses me by his demonstrated incompetence

>
>The allusion was not to the Third Reich, it was to Arnie's picketing associate.
>

LOL

These clowns cant event keep track of their own lies

A stranger walks up to me on a the street, asked me if I have any extra picket signs... I say sure.. and hand him one - at the instant I handed him one, cameras were clicking inside FCDC Org... The photos were introduced as evidence in a court case, Under oath I descibed the situation that ocurred this way.
The guy I later found out was a sole operator of something called the anarchist workers party, On the web somewhere is an actual press release from this same guy saying Im not associated with him in any way.

Anarchists are not nazi's..

The claim of neo-Nazi association stems from the fact that I
had the nerve to interview a fellow who ran The liberty Lobby
which publishes the spotlight, to discuss the fact that his 2nd in command had recently been a scientologist named Thom Marcellus, and
this fellow was very disturbed by this, and wanted to know more about the nature of the empire of lies.

You can't even keep your owns straight you osa moron.

Now from the 2nd appelate court opinion in time magazine which your cult LOST:"o the extent that the Behar Article uses the term "Scientology," Chief Judge Walker is of the view that the term as used denotes a belief system, or, as the Article puts it, a "cult"

So you are a cult , got it, and, you have knowingly lied....

The legal definition of malice: [ from same opinion ]


". Despite its name, the actual malice standard does not measure malice in the sense of ill will or animosity, but instead the speaker's subjective doubts about the truth of the publication. See Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 U.S. 496, 510 (1991) ("Actual malice under the New York Times standard should not be confused with the concept of malice as an evil intent or a motive arising from spite or ill will."

https://www.tourolaw.edu/FTP/SecondCircuit/January01/98-9522.rtf

have a nice day

Arnie Lerma


>> you run afoul of Godwin's Law,
> to the
>>universal derision of people everywhere.
>
>"Universal"? "Everywhere"? Funny, but this is just about the only place I ever
>run across this type of tripe.
>
>>CLUELESS!
>
>You're shouting.
>
>>
>>Deana Holmes
>>mirele@sonic.net
>

Moral of this post:: arguments which have no legs to stand on, don't even notice when you shoot one off...