On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 10:14:08 -0700, SCN Lurker <scnist@lurker.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 16:29:06 GMT, alerma@nospam.bellatlantic.net
>(arnie lerma) wrote:
consider this scenario - displayed in here in Scieno-speak


SITUATION: Staff Blows are at Highest ever

{ a "blow" is a sudden departure " eg got the hell out )

DATA: Staff Blows from Flag { headquarters in Clearwater ) as well as PAC ( Los Angeles area) and outer orgs have been traced to staff use of public terminals at public libraries during their liberty time. 6 blows from FLB ( Flag Land Base ) in last 6 months have all read the newsgroup alt.religion.scientology at the Clearwater County Library as was disclosed durng routine auditing. .

Libraries' Public terminal's avoid having porno available on their public terminals.


HANDLING:      SPAM ARS with kiddie porn posts will force Public Libraries to stop carrying ARS on their public terminals.

OSA Bureau { Office of Special Affairs dirty tricks division )  to write and implement plan accomplishing this immediately.

This is OK

Signed


some duplicator of source

 

(arnie lerma) wrote:

>

"But they will know it is us..."

Thants OK spam lots of newsgroups like we did the spam sporge,
That will give us plausible deniability and our 'reasonable bots"
on the channel will echo this...

those dopes never connect the dots until its too late anyway"

>>On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 16:29:06 GMT, alerma@nospam.bellatlantic.net
>>(arnie lerma) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>consider this scenario - displayed in here in Scieno-speak
>>
>>>HANDLING: SPAM ARS with kiddie porn posts will force Public Libraries
>>>to stop carrying ARS on their public terminals.

>>On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 10:14:08 -0700, SCN Lurker <scnist@lurker.com>
>>wrote:

>>Hmm, this is actually pretty plausible.

>>On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 19:06:23 GMT, alerma@nospam.bellatlantic.net
>>(arnie lerma) wrote:

> Yeah but you'd have have done a star rate checked out Completed Staff
>Work HCOPL, for example, to consider it as a plausability...

>>I have checked out on that one. I'm Staff Status II...:-)

>Never underestimate the unmitgated gall of $cientology,
>always ISO a few more people to fool.

>>I've lost you on this paragraph. What does "ISO a few more people to
fool" mean?

ISO = In search Of

 


- SCN Lurker